In
her article, “From book appeal to reading appeal: Redefining the concept of
appeal in readers’ advisory,” Dali states, “The advisory process,
by definition, is complex and involved.
It entails an ongoing back-and-forth interaction, negotiation, consultation,
and opinion exchange between the librarian and the reader (2014, p. 24). My Secret Shopper experience was extremely
pleasant and followed this type of process.
I entered the library branch and began by looking for a staff member at
one of the Information Desks. I
approached Kyle and stated that I was looking for a book to read. I decided to use this opportunity to find a
book for the horror genre.
Kyle’s initial question was, “What
were the last four books that I read.” I
mentioned that I recently finished The
Girl on the Train, and while I enjoyed it, it wasn’t great and I had preferred
Gone Girl’s plot twists. He followed-up by asking me what elements I
liked about Gone Girl. I mentioned that I liked the unexpected
nature. He wasn’t asking me specifically about horror, so I volunteered the
information myself. I mentioned that the
only horror book that had ever scared me was The Shining. He asked what I
liked about that book. I shared that I
tend to like horror that has elements that are believable—not necessarily
supernatural or creature-driven. I then
mentioned that one of the few horror movies to really scare me was Paranormal Activity, and I liked the
realistic nature of the plot.
As he was asking questions, he
was typing the information, but I wasn’t able to see his computer screen. I asked what he uses when someone is looking
for a book to read. He mentioned that he
uses NoveList, and asked if I had ever used it.
I was trying to hide the fact that I am an employee and a student, so I
fibbed and said that I hadn’t. He
elaborated and said that the likes to base his recommendations off of what I am
telling him, not just the top of his head.
What he has enjoyed is not important.
He said that if he is desperate, he will use Amazon because the patron
wants a recommendation quickly. However,
he doesn’t like this resource as it is based on “purchases” and not necessarily
recommendations. Wesley states,
“Learning and utilizing electronic resources as well as taking advantage of the
wealth of professional reading available to help make reader's advisory fun and
easy should become an integral part of a librarian's job” (2006, p. 8).
He said that he also has a form
that he will have someone complete if they seem totally lost, and he is looking
for more information to base his advisory recommendations. Filling out the form takes extra time, so he
only uses it when he knows the person won’t mind spending the time on finding a
book to read.
He found four recommendations for
me to start with by walking with me through the stacks, pulling each book, and
providing a brief description for each one.
·
The
Breaker by Walters
·
In
the Blood by Unger
·
House
of Leaves by Danielewski
·
Starter
House by Condit
I found a table to sit at and examine the recommendations. I used my iPad to connect to NoveList and see
how each one was categorized in relation to the horror genre, their rating, and
their descriptions. As I was looking through
the books, he brought several more for me to look over, providing a description
for those as well.
·
The
Silent Wife by Harrison
·
The
Ruins by Smith
·
And three books by Simmons
o
The
Abominable
o
The
Terror
o
Drood
He let me know that he was available if I still needed
more assistance, and not to worry about placing the books back on the shelf
because he would take care of that later.
After
examining the selections, I decided to check out three of the recommendations
that caught my interest.
·
House
of Leaves by Danielewski
·
Starter
House by Condit
·
The
Ruins by Smith
When I had time later, I tried to recreate the same
type of search Kyle performed to see what types of results I would find. I used NoveList and started with The Shining. The read-alikes list did provide many of his
recommendations. However, he either also
had to search specific elements to find the other titles, or he pulled them
from his own knowledge and experience.
Dali states, “A face-to-face RA interaction will also introduce a much
needed conversational element and flexibility into the process, whereas a
static web-based form will always convey a feel of formal questioning” (2014,
p. 45). I could easily use the same
website that he used to find books to read, yet his personal conversation
allowed me to have more of a direction and personal connection to my choices. I work at the main branch of my library
system, and I asked one of the Reader Advisors for the form that they use to
perform extended advisory recommendations.
She let me know that Kyle created his own form, but they do not use it
system-wide. I realized that I was very
fortunate to work with Kyle for this assignment (with no hindsight that he
would do a good job). He definitely made
an effort to ensure that I was happy with his choices, and made me feel that he
was available if he needed to explore further.
Works Cited
Dali,
K. k. (2014). From Book Appeal to Reading Appeal: Redefining the Concept of
Appeal in Readers' Advisory. Library Quarterly, 84(1), 22-48.
Wesley,
H. (2006). Reader's Advisory: A Continuing Education. Alabama Librarian,
56(1), 7-8.
Be still my beating heart! Sounds like Kyle did a great job! I'm glad he talked about Amazon not being a great way to find suggestions. We talked about that some in my reference class - the fact that it's based on purchases rather than appeal elements. That's a good thing to tell patrons who are trying to learn how to find books on their own, too.
ReplyDelete